Element of Corporate Governance in Islamic Banks vs Conventional Banks: A Case Study
Abstract
Corporate governance (CG) have gained a prominent place in the sustainability of any institution, be it a corporate or a bank. Individuals lack detailed knowledge on the applicability of CG and its aspects in Islamic Banks (IBs) in contrast to Conventional Banks (CBs). Thus, the objective of this study is to explore ‘how’ and ‘why’ IBs differ from CBs in terms of structure of CG and its elements mainly board responsibilities, legal and regulatory compliance, internal control environment and auditing from a fundamental perspective. The study adopts interpretative methodology and multiple case study strategy in selecting one bank to represent each banking systems. Further, primary and secondary data were collected through interviews, observations, reports and websites. Major findings of the study concluded that IBs and CBs enclose differences as well as similarities pertaining to their CG and selected aspects. Major differences are driven connecting to the framework of IBs as they need to follow interest free paradigm, Profit and Loss Sharing paradigm and Shariah principles in performing the banking functions. Hence, these major principles have influenced for emergence of different CG structure in IBs.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jibf.v3n1a5
Abstract
Corporate governance (CG) have gained a prominent place in the sustainability of any institution, be it a corporate or a bank. Individuals lack detailed knowledge on the applicability of CG and its aspects in Islamic Banks (IBs) in contrast to Conventional Banks (CBs). Thus, the objective of this study is to explore ‘how’ and ‘why’ IBs differ from CBs in terms of structure of CG and its elements mainly board responsibilities, legal and regulatory compliance, internal control environment and auditing from a fundamental perspective. The study adopts interpretative methodology and multiple case study strategy in selecting one bank to represent each banking systems. Further, primary and secondary data were collected through interviews, observations, reports and websites. Major findings of the study concluded that IBs and CBs enclose differences as well as similarities pertaining to their CG and selected aspects. Major differences are driven connecting to the framework of IBs as they need to follow interest free paradigm, Profit and Loss Sharing paradigm and Shariah principles in performing the banking functions. Hence, these major principles have influenced for emergence of different CG structure in IBs.
Full Text: PDF DOI: 10.15640/jibf.v3n1a5
Browse Journals
Journal Policies
Information
Useful Links
- Call for Papers
- Submit Your Paper
- Publish in Your Native Language
- Subscribe the Journal
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Contact the Executive Editor
- Recommend this Journal to Librarian
- View the Current Issue
- View the Previous Issues
- Recommend this Journal to Friends
- Recommend a Special Issue
- Comment on the Journal
- Publish the Conference Proceedings
Latest Activities
Resources
Visiting Status
Today | 99 |
Yesterday | 103 |
This Month | 3526 |
Last Month | 3807 |
All Days | 1190760 |
Online | 20 |